Salient Object Detection: A Benchmark

By Ali Borji, Ming-Ming Cheng, Huaizu Jiang, Jia Li. 2015

1,834 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We extensively compare, qualitatively and quantitatively, 41 state-of-the-art models (29 salient object detection, 10 fixation prediction, 1 objectness, and 1 baseline) over seven challenging data sets for the purpose of benchmarking salient object detection and segmentation methods. From the results obtained so far, our evaluation shows a consistent rapid progress over the last few years in terms of both accuracy and running time. The top contenders in this benchmark significantly outperform the models identified as the best in the previous benchmark conducted three years ago. We find that the models designed specifically for salient object detection generally work better than models in closely related areas, which in turn provides a precise definition and suggests an appropriate treatment of this problem that distinguishes it from other problems. In particular, we analyze the influences of center bias and scene complexity in model performance, which, along with the hard cases for the state-of-the-art models, provide useful hints toward constructing more challenging large-scale data sets and better saliency models. Finally, we propose probable solutions for tackling several open problems, such as evaluation scores and data set bias, which also suggest future research directions in the rapidly growing field of salient object detection.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Dacheng Tao
  2. Bernt Schiele
  3. Chunhua Shen
  4. Trevor Darrell
  5. Philip H. S. Torr
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Alan L. Yuille
  8. Luc Van Gool

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  2. Ming-Ming Cheng
  3. Luc Van Gool
  4. Dacheng Tao
  5. Ling Shao
  6. Huchuan Lu
  7. Xiaogang Wang
  8. Yi Yang

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  2. Ming-Ming Cheng
  3. Anton van den Hengel
  4. Chunhua Shen
  5. Deng-Ping Fan
  6. Huchuan Lu
  7. Ling Shao
  8. Suo Qiu

Citations in the corpus