Evaluating Environmental Public Participation: Methodological Questions
By C. Chess. 2000
220 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Management Science and Operations Research, Public Administration
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0fa4ea9c764c16d3657d4451cd007d8abdca14b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Public Administration
Citations in the corpus
- Is Adaptive Co-management Delivering? Examining Relationships Between Collaboration, Learning and Outcomes in UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (2017, background): “For example, evaluation was a general void in co-management (Plummer and Armitage, 2007a) and rare in collaborative planning (Chess, 2000; Bellamy et al., 2001; Frame et al., 2004).”
- A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world (2007, background): “Even the broader notion of collaborative environmental planning is recognized as being rarely evalu- ated (Chess, 2000; Bellamy et al., 2001; Frame et al., 2004).”