Rank ordering engineering designs: pairwise comparison charts and Borda counts

By Clive L. Dym, William H. Wood III, Michael J. Scott. 2002

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0cdce8932b88637fafe4ccd363e86fd911950ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Greg Finak
2. Holger H. Hoos
3. Raphael Gottardo
4. Frank Hutter
5. Matthias Feurer
6. Katharina Eggensperger

Citations in the corpus

• CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF AUTOMATED FLOW CYTOMETRY DATA ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES (2013, methodology): “Fractional ranking is based on the Borda count strategy 40 - for N algorithms, the top algorithm scored N points, the second one N –1 points, and so on.”
• Arrow’s theorem, multi-criteria decision problems and multi-attribute preferences in engineering design (2005, background): “The problem of what, for all of the team members together, should then be considered the best design is exactly the type of problem that Arrow was considering in 1950, and the relevance of Arrow’s theorem to engineering design has indeed been discussed from this perspective (e.g. Hazelrigg 1996; Dy”