Finding Social Groups: A Meta-Analysis of the Southern Women Data

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Finding overlapping communities in networks by label propagation (2009, methodology): “Woman 16 is placed in both communities by another of the solutions in [39], as well as COPRA.”
Detecting communities and their evolutions in dynamic social networks—a Bayesian approach (2011, background): “Table 2 The southern women data, from (Freeman 2003) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .”
Energy Models for Graph Clustering (2007, unknown): “Freeman [18] performed a meta-analysis of 21 earlier studies that assigned the women to groups.”
A framework for analysis of dynamic social networks (2006, methodology): “Freeman [15] compares 21 different social network analysis techniques on this dataset.”
Networks in Political Science: Back to the Future (2011, unknown): “…also received signiﬁcant approach that has been developed to detect a variety of structural regularities in network data at the , triadic, and higher levels Beyond that, there have various eﬀorts over the to detect cohesive sub-groups (Freeman 2003), with detection” (see Porter, , and Mucha 2009).”
A framework for community identification in dynamic social networks (2007, methodology): “[12] L. Freeman.”