The Economics of Place-Making Policies

By Edward L. Glaeser, Joshua D. Gottlieb. 2008

619 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0c26ccb1d4efee5f7dc195141336cc4367fe4e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Urban Studies

Citations in the corpus

A World of Cities: The Causes and Consequences of Urbanization in Poorer Countries (2014, neutral): “6 Glaeser and Gottlieb (2008) discuss the estimation of these magnitudes in the U.S.”
The Complementarity between Cities and Skills (2009, neutral): “The first regression of Table 1 shows the 0.041 coefficient when individual yearly log earnings are regressed on metropolitan area size (also found in Glaeser and Gottlieb, 2008).”
The birth of edge cities in China: Measuring the effects of industrial parks policy (2017, neutral): “Therefore it is interesting to understand why this place-based policy did not work well in many developed countries ( Busso et al., 2013; Glaeser and Gottlieb, 2008; Papke, 1994 ), but has an optimistic outcome in China.”
Agglomeration Effects in Colombia (2016, neutral): “As noted by Glaeser and Gottlieb (2008) and Moretti (2011), even though agglomeration effects rely on market failures, the distribution of population across cities need not be inefficient.”
Local multipliers and human capital in the United States and Sweden (2013, neutral): “The benefits of these policies are not fully understood, as the empirical evidence is scarce (Bartik, 1991; Glaeser and Gottlieb, 2008, provide in depth discussions of the economic rationales behind these policies; Bartik, 2012).”
Location-based tax incentives: Evidence from India (2017, neutral): “(10)Neumark and Kolko (2010), Greenbaum and Engberg (2004), and Bondonio and Greenbaum (2007) find no effects of enterprise zones on employment growth.”
Optimal Spatial Policies, Geography, and Sorting* (2018, positive): “Using a different notation, Proposition 1 of Glaeser and Gottlieb (2008) solves this planner problem, which leads to equalization of marginal returns and therefore of vj . Kline and Moretti (2014a) make the similar point that if dL workers are reallocated from i to j, then there are no gains from re”