How to set the holding cost rates in average cost inventory models with reverse logistics

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Quantitative models for reverse logistics (2001, unknown): “In this context it is worth mentioning that some authors have recently discussed the appropriate determination of inventory carrying costs in a Reverse Logistics context (see Corbey et al., 1999; Teunter et al., 2000).”
Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art. (2010, background): “Teunter et al. (2000) carry out a simulation analysis to evaluate the performance of alternative rules to set the inventory holding cost rates for a continuous review model with stochastic demand and return of items, and fixed positive lead times for manufacturing and remanufacturing.”
Managing New and Remanufactured Products (2006, unknown): “These issues include the timing and volume of product returns, yield estimation, balancing demand with core returns, and managing reverse logistics (Ferrer and Whybark 2001; Guide 1997, 2000; Kekre et al. 2003; Richter and Sombrutzki 2000; Teunter et al. 2000; van der Laan and Salomon 1999).”
Green Supply-Chain Management: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review (2007, methodology): “Examples of periodic review models include: a model in which returned products can be re-used directly (Ferrer 1997a); a model with a holding cost (Teunter et al. 2000); a model with variable set-up numbers (Richter 1996); and models considering the effects of non-zero lead-times (Inderfurth and…”