From Uncaused Will to Conscious Choice: The Need to Study, Not Speculate About People’s Folk Concept of Free Will

By Andrew E. Monroe, Bertram F. Malle. 2010

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0b1915f06dff9d828470b6d266fcc82fa101eb2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Roy F. Baumeister
2. A. W. Crescioni
3. N. Lambert
4. Lauren Brewer
5. Sarah E. Ainsworth
6. Michael R. Ent

In Philosophy

1. N. Lambert
2. Roy F. Baumeister

Citations in the corpus

• Believing versus Disbelieving in Free Will: Correlates and Consequences (2012, background): “There is not yet a clear consensus on what exactly is the construct of free will that people believe in to varying degrees, though some work has moved the field closer to this understanding (Monroe & Malle, 2010).”
• Subjective correlates and consequences of belief in free will (2016, background): “When Monroe and Malle (2010) asked participants to “explain in a few lines what you think it means to have free will,” the themes that appeared most frequently across responses were being able to make choices, acting according to one’s own desires, accepting responsibility for one’s actions, and…”