Describing species. Practical taxonomic procedure for biologists

By C. V. J. V. Klein. 2009

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Taxonomic Revision of the Saki Monkeys, Pithecia Desmarest, 1804 (2014, background): “…status until evidence is provided to delineate Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Neotropical-Primates on 16 May 2019 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Neotropical Primates 21(1), July 2014 9 them further (Winston, 1999; Van Roosmalen et al., 2002; Groves, 2004, pers. comm.).”
Open Nomenclature in the biodiversity era (2016, background): “Some general indications are presented in textbooks on taxonomic procedures (e.g. Schenk & McMasters 1936; Winston 1999).”
The terrestrial and freshwater invertebrate biodiversity of the archipelagoes of the Barents Sea; Svalbard, Franz Josef Land and Novaya Zemlya (2014, background): “Unfortunately, the type material has not survived (Winston, 1999)”
Cuticular hydrocarbon profiles as a taxonomic tool: advantages, limitations and technical aspects (2012, background): “Identification of these remains a big challenge for taxonomists (Winston, 1999).”
A taxonomic revision of the Neotropical poison frog genus Ranitomeya (Amphibia: Dendrobatidae) (2011, background): “In 2006, shortly after the publication of the taxonomy of Grant et al. (2006), feeling this taxonomy was unnecessary and confusing; we (J.”