Underwater optical communications systems. Part 2: basic design considerations

By J. W. Giles, I. Bankman. IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2005

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Long Distance Underwater Visible Light Communication System With Single Photon Avalanche Diode (2016, background): “According to the analysis of [10], the downwelling solar background optical power on the detector is below −80 dBmW under the depth of hundreds of meters, even if the field of view angle is 90◦.”
Underwater Optical Wireless Communication (2016, background): “In [48], authors presented an underwater model for evaluating transmission”
A Survey of Underwater Optical Wireless Communications (2017, methodology): “Smart [60] and Giles and Bankman [61] evaluated the performance of a UOWC system based on Beer-Lambert law in different water types and different communication ranges.”
LED Based Indoor Visible Light Communications: State of the Art (2015, background): “Acoustic (sonar) communication devices are expensive and also have limited data rate (∼10 kb/s) due to the slow speed of acoustic waves in water [259].”
Underwater Optical Wireless Communications: Overview (2020, methodology): “For traditional detection devices and methods, due to the exponential attenuation of the water, the optical communication distance is less than 100 m [56,70].”