Ecosystem structure, function, and restoration success: Are they related?
By Jordi Cortinaa, Fernando Tomás Maestreb, Ramon Vallejoc, Manuel Jaime Baezac, Alejandro Valdecantosc, Marian Pérez-Devesac. 2006
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a077c1a62b4604ebacafd34eaceb9051ac4057bb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- F. Pugnaire
- Fernando T. Maestre
- C. Armas
- L. Cavieres
- Fabien Anthelme
- R. Callaway
- Richard Michalet
- Rob W. Brooker
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- F. Pugnaire
- Fernando T. Maestre
- R. Callaway
- Richard Michalet
- L. Cavieres
- C. Armas
- P. Liancourt
- Rob W. Brooker
Citations in the corpus
- From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits (2009, background): “Further research is needed to link system structure to process (Cortina et al., 2006) and then process to ecological and social benefits to understand regional complexity.”
- Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future (2007, background): “…(Suding et al. 2004), succession (Walker et al. 2007) or the links between ecosystem structure/function and restoration success (Young et al. 2005; Cortina et al. 2006), are likely further to help managers and practitioners to develop effective tools to achieve the desired restoration targets.”