How important are choice of model selection method and spatial autocorrelation of presence data for distribution modelling by MaxEnt
By Rune Halvorsen, Dr. Sabrina Mazzoni, John Wirkola Dirksen, Erik Næsset, Terje Gobakken, M. Ohlson. 2016
94 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Environmental Engineering, Epidemiology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a0761c1b1dfe3b968b3f2f9f62fa4941539e808b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Inger Auestad
- K. Rydgren
- Julien Vollering
- Alexander Brenning
- Rune Halvorsen
- Cory Merow
- John A. Silander
In Environmental Engineering
In Epidemiology
Citations in the corpus
- Bunching up the background betters bias in species distribution models (2019, methodology): “When modeling real distributions, subset variable selection seems to produce more parsimonious models than lasso regularization (Halvorsen et al. 2016).”
- Performance evaluation and hyperparameter tuning of statistical and machine-learning models using spatial data (2018, background): “Ecological applications range from species distribution models (Halvorsen et al., 2016; Quillfeldt et al., 2017; Wieland et al., 2017), predicting floristic (Muenchow et al., 2013a) and faunal composition to disentangling the relationships between species and their environment (Muenchow et al.,…”