Determination of the blow-up rate for the semilinear wave equation
By F. Merle, Hatem Zaag. 2003
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a07503f1d883f9f225a4ff7c749b059feb1346bc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
In Control and Systems Engineering
In Mathematical Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Scattering for the radial 3D cubic wave equation (2014, background): “In two remarkable works, Merle and Zaag [39, 40] determined that all blow-up solutions must blow-up at the self-similar rate.”
- Determination of the blow-up rate for a critical semilinear wave equation (2005, methodology): “In this paper, we consider the critical case of our previous work [17] p = pc ≡ 1 + 4 N − 1 where N ≥ 2.”
- Slow blow-up solutions for the $H^1({\mathbb R}^3)$ critical focusing semilinear wave equation (2009, background): “The question of the blow-up rate was addressed by Merle–Zaag in the conformal range p ≤ 3, see [13]–[15] (their results extend to all dimensions).”
- Openness of the Set of Non-characteristic Points and Regularity of the Blow-up Curve for the 1 D Semilinear Wave Equation (2008, methodology): “We first recall some dispersion estimates from [3] and [16]: Lemma 3.”
- Concentration Compactness for Critical Wave Maps (2009, background): “This is proved as in [31], see Lemma 2.”
- Existence and universality of the blow-up profile for the semilinear wave equation in one space dimension (2007, methodology): “Proof: Remark from [17] (identity (11) page 1152) that we have for all s1 ≥ s0 and s2 ≥ s0 + 1, p− 1 2(p+ 1) ∫ s2+1”