Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer.

By U. Nestle, S. Kremp, A. Schaefer-Schuler, Christiane Sebastian-Welsch, D. Hellwig, C. Rübe, C. Kirsch. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2005

646 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques (2010, methodology): “technique [94] and three fully automated methods: standard FCM [120], the FCM-S which incorporates nonlinear anisotropic diffusion filtering thus allowing the integration of spatial contextual information and the FCMSW algorithm which also considers inhomogeneity of tracer uptake through the use of ”
A Fuzzy Locally Adaptive Bayesian Segmentation Approach for Volume Determination in PET (2009, background): “Thresholding: Various thresholding methodologies have been proposed in the past for functional volume determination [2]–[4].”
Repeatability and Reproducibility of Radiomic Features: A Systematic Review (2018, unknown): “Orlhac et al (19) studied textural feature reproducibility with respect to 2 different semiautomated segmentation algorithms: an adaptive method (67) and a more conventional thresholding method based on 40% of the maximum standardized uptake value.”