Darwinism and developmental systems
By Paul E. Griffiths, R. Gray. 2001
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a066d61e3ab40da90b2ac26adf6509b6d4a330d9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Paul E. Griffiths
- Eva Jablonka
- R. Gray
- Alex Mesoudi
- Nicholas Shea
- Robert A. Wilson
- Andrea Scarantino
- M. Mameli
Citations in the corpus
- Genetic Information: A Metaphor in Search of a Theory (2001, background): “(Gray 2001, Griffiths and Gray 2001) Some other factor needs to be added to the insistence on stable inheritance in order to defend the special, informational status of genes.”
- Discussion: Three Ways to Misunderstand Developmental Systems Theory (2005, background): “Moreover, advocates of DST who have discussed its implications for evolutionary theory have stressed the importance of selection in designing developmental systems that can assemble the same matrix of developmental resources in each generation ( Griffiths and Gray 1994, 2001 ).”
- Information: Its Interpretation, Its Inheritance, and Its Sharing (2002, background): “They are just one type of informational source that contributes to the development of living organisms (Griffiths and Gray 2001, Sterelny and Griffiths 1999).”