Tomography of temperature gradient metamorphism of snow and associated changes in heat conductivity

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

3-D image-based numerical computations of snow permeability: links to specific surface area, density, and microstructural anisotropy (2012, methodology): “More recently, the availability of 3-D images of snow and firn from X-ray tomography (Brzoska et al., 1999; Col é u et al., 2001; Freitag et al., 2004; Schneebeli and Sokratov, 2004; Kaempfer et al., 2005; Chen and Baker, 2010) opened the way to numerical simulations, applying to snow the methods de”
A microstructural approach to model heat transfer in snow (2005, methodology): “[5] We sieved snow into a cylindrical sample holder developed for temperature gradient metamorphism experiments inside the micro-tomograph [ Schneebeli and Sokratov, 2004 ], resulting in a snow sample of 2 cm height and 4.8 cm in diameter.”
Numerical and experimental investigations of the effective thermal conductivity of snow (2011, methodology): “This was done using 30 different 3D images of snow obtained by means of microtomography [Brzoska et al., 1999; Coléou et al., 2001; Schneebeli and Sokratov, 2004; Kaempfer et al., 2005].”
Snow physics as relevant to snow photochemistry (2007, methodology): “This method requires a synchrotron (Flin et al., 2003) with the benefit of good spatial resolution and fast data acquisition, or a microtomograph (Schneebeli and Sokratov, 2004; Kerbrat et al., 2007).”