The biotic ligand model: a historical overview.

By P. Paquin, J. Gorsuch, S. Apte, G. Batley, K. Bowles, P. Campbell, C. Delos, Dominic M. Di Toro, R. Dwyer, F. Galvez and 12 more. Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP, 2002

788 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/452fc01149f58c88e87e823c7ef62ef81cc244e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. C. Brauner
2. A. Farrell
3. C. Wood

In Pollution

1. C. Brauner
2. A. Farrell
3. C. Wood

In Water Science and Technology

1. C. Brauner
2. A. Farrell
3. C. Wood

Citations in the corpus

• Water Quality of Effluent-dominated Ecosystems: Ecotoxicological, Hydrological, and Management Considerations (2006, background): “The potential utility of biotic ligand modeling, based on chemical equilibrium, is a quantitative characterization of sitespecific water quality parameter influences on metal speciation and bioavailability to aquatic organisms (Paquin et al., 2002).”
• Homeostasis and toxicology of essential metals (2012, background): “Together, the GSIM and FIAM provided the theoretical framework for the modern biotic ligand models (BLMs) (Paquin et al., 2000, 2002; McGeer et al., 2000; Di Toro et al., 2001; Santore et al., 2001; Niyogi and Wood, 2004a; Paquin et al., Chapter 9, Vol. 31B).”