Set estimation: another bridge between statistics and geometry
By A. González. 2009
52 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a05d86f0488a498098237f504170bce345295330
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Sivaraman Balakrishnan
- Larry A. Wasserman
- Bertrand Michel
- Mathieu Carrière
- Tudor Manole
- Jonathan Niles-Weed
- Steve Y. Oudot
- John C. Duchi
Citations in the corpus
- Statistical Analysis and Parameter Selection for Mapper (2017, background): “All of them can be found, together with their proofs, in Dey and Wang (2013) and Carrière and Oudot (2015).”
- Topological Data Analysis (2016, methodology): “The red lines show an estmate of S using the methods in Section 3.3. d-dimensional but it does converge to S in the following sense (Cuevas, 2009; Fasy et al., 2014b; Niyogi et al., 2008; Cuevas et al., 2001; Chazal et al., 2014b).”
- Plugin estimation of smooth optimal transport maps (2021, background): “…exist 0, δ0 > 0 such that for all x ∈ Ω and ∈ (0, 0), L(B(x, ) ∩ Ω) ≥ δ0L(B(x, )), where recall that L denotes the Lebesgue measure on Rd. Condition (S2) arises frequently in the literature on statistical set estimation (Cuevas and Fraiman, 1997; Cuevas, 2009), and prevents Ω from admitting cusps.”