Sexual selection and genital evolution.

By D. Hosken, P. Stockley. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2004

716 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/44aa2695151170d59abbf1564606802d3bb8089b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Leigh W. Simmons
2. S. Cameron
3. Mari Katvala
4. Ya Tang
5. M. Andersson
6. Jianwu Yao
7. J. Rönn
8. K. Matsubayashi

In Genetics

1. Leigh W. Simmons
2. S. Cameron
3. K. Matsubayashi
4. I. Ohshima
5. Mari Katvala
6. M. Andersson
7. J. Rönn
8. Paul H. Williams

Citations in the corpus

• The bumblebees of Sichuan (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini) (2009, background): “Many of these male genital structures show complex elaborations (for discussion of selection mechanisms see e.g. Eberhard, 1985; Hosken & Stockley, 2004) that are particularly valuable as taxonomic characters (Figs 132–187).”
• Sexual selection and genital evolution (2014, background): “Nonetheless, regardless of the precise mechanisms involved, sexual selection is now widely acknowledged as being a significant force driving the evolution of animal genitalia (Hosken & Stockley 2004), and much of the evidence for the sexual selection hypothesis comes from studies of insects.”
• Sex role preferences, gender conflict and sperm trading in simultaneous hermaphrodites : a new framework (2006, background): “…confirmed to affect a wide range of fitness-related traits, including mating rates, female remating, egg laying, reproductive morphology and resource allocation (reviewed in Arnqvist & Nilsson 2000; Chapman et al. 2003; Kokko et al. 2003; Hosken & Stockley 2004; Arnqvist & Rowe 2005; Parker 2006).”
• Ecological speciation in phytophagous insects (2010, background): “…diversity of insect genitalic structures suggests that postmating-prezygotic isolation could be common in insects (Shapiro & Porter, 1989; Sota & Kubota, 1998; Hosken & Stockley, 2004), there is very little data linking divergent selection to the evolution of this form of reproductive isolation.”
• Sexual selection and mate choice. (2006, result): “There is increasing experimental support for such a notion [ 51 ,52].”
• The costs of mating and egg production in Callosobruchus seed beetles (2006, background): “In general, the morphological structures of male genitalia evolve very rapidly among insects (Eberhard 1985; Arnqvist 1998; Hosken & Stockley 2004 ), including bruchid beetles (Kingsolver 1970).”