Enumeration, measurement, and identification of net zooplankton samples using the ZOOSCAN digital imaging system
By Philippe Grosjean, M. Picheral, Caroline Warembourg, Gabriel Gorsky. 2004
223 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a01c81a9592e7de783a3960be37e71e4d13f1dd5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Water Science and Technology
Citations in the corpus
- In situ particle size distributions and volume concentrations from a LISST-100 laser particle sizer and a digital floc camera (2005, background): “Numerous devices have been constructed in various laboratories over the last 2–3 decades to collect images of particles under water (Knowles and Wells, 1996; Maldiney and Mouchel, 1996; Syvitski and Hutton, 1996; Thomsen et al., 1996; Grosjean et al., 2004).”
- Digital zooplankton image analysis using the ZooScan integrated system (2010, methodology): “We have in the past used such systems by adapting commercial scanners (Grosjean et al., 2004).”
- Zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: a comparison between subtropical and Antarctic organisms (2009, methodology): “Unfortunately, pattern recognition methods are not a standard at present, but important advances to discern between copepods, euphausiids, and some gelatinous organisms at a genus level can be used for routine work (Grosjean et al. 2004).”