Juror Stereotypes and Blame Attribution in Rape Cases Involving Intoxicants: The Findings of a Pilot Study

By E. Finch, V. Munro. 2004

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Reacting to rape: Exploring mock jurors' assessments of complainant credibility. (2008, background): “…may be infl uenced in their deliberations by a number of extra-legal stereotypes about ‘ appropriate ’ socio-sexual behaviour (see, e.g. Feild and Bienen 1980 ; Burt and Albin 1981 ; Tetreault 1989 ; Lonsway and Fitzgerald 1994 ; Ward 1995 ; Finch and Munro 2005 ; 2006; Temkin and Krahe 2008 ).”
Rape Myths: History, Individual and Institutional-Level Presence, and Implications for Change (2011, background): “Additionally, in cases in which consent is less clearly delineated, such as when drugs or alcohol are implicated, mock jurors have stated that they would like more information on whether the woman was generally the type to act in a promiscuous manner (Finch and Munro 2005).”
Of ‘Normal Sex’ and ‘Real Rape’: Exploring The Use of Socio-Sexual Scripts in (Mock) Jury Deliberation (2009, background): “…or innocence by a range of extra-legal stereotypes about ‘appropriate’ sociosexual behaviour (Feild and Bienen, 1980; Heilbrun, 1980; Burt and Albin, 1981; Tetreault, 1989; Burt, 1994; Lonsway and Fitzgerald, 1994; Ward, 1995; Finch and Munro, 2005, 2006; Taylor, 2007; Temkin and Krahe, 2008).”