Disruptive Transportation: The Adoption, Utilization, and Impacts of Ride-Hailing in the United States

By Regina R. Clewlow, G. Mishra. 2017

581 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a006d53c957871f29d579f607c582979ab4b1cf5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Trends in Taxi Use and the Advent of Ridehailing, 1995–2017: Evidence from the US National Household Travel Survey (2018, background): “If the availability of ridehailing allows users to give up or not purchase a car (and there is some evidence that it does [21,24]), on any individual trip they may decide between ridehailing and transit.”
Can sharing a ride make for less traffic? Evidence from Uber and Lyft and implications for cities (2021, background): “Even with the high trip densities of New York City, waiting times would average 2.8 min with a mean trip delay of 3.5 min in one study (Alonso-Mora et al., 2017).”
Rider-to-rider discriminatory attitudes and ridesharing behavior (2019, background): “Even 26 compared with U.S. urban populations, users of TNCs are more likely to be young, highly educated 27 and higher income (Clewlow & Mishra, 2017).”
Does ride-hailing increase or decrease vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT)? A simulation approach for Santiago de Chile (2020, background): “Other authors like Rayle et al. (2016) have not been conclusive on this issue, while Clewlow and Mishra (2017) conclude that ride-hailing has likely increased VKT in the seven cities in which they collected data.”
Mobility-on-demand versus fixed-route transit systems: An evaluation of traveler preferences in low-income communities (2019, background): “, Clewlow and Mishra (2017); Smith (2016)), which found that about 75% of the U.”
The rise of electric vehicles—2020 status and future expectations (2021, unknown): “…mobility-as-a-service solutions cater to the consumer’s need for quick, convenient, and cost-effective transportation and may lead to drops in car-ownership and driver-licensure rates (Garikapati et al 2016, Clewlow and Mishra 2017, Movmi 2018, Walmsley 2018, Henao and Marshall 2019, Arevalo 2020).”
Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review (2019, background): “Based on survey results for San Francisco, Rayle et al. (2016) find that the presence of ridesourcing might not affect car ownership behavior; Clewlow and Mishra (2017) find that 91% of ridesourcing users did not make any changes to car ownership in survey results for seven major cities in the US.”
Understanding the Recent Transit Ridership Decline in Major US Cities: Service Cuts or Emerging Modes? (2019, background): “26 A survey of TNC users in seven US cities finds that TNCs are associated with a 6% derease in 27 bus trips, a 3% decrease in light rail trips, and a 3% increase in commuter rail trips (30).”
How app-based ride-hailing services influence travel behavior: An empirical study from China (2020, background): “Private car hailing services can be regarded as a typical form of shared mobility, because people either share rides or their private car with others (Clewlow & Mishra, 2017).”
Who Uses Ride-Hailing Services in the United States? (2019, background): “For instance, ride-hailing services appear to complement commuter rail trips but substitute bus and other rail trips (3).”
Uber, Public Transit, and Urban Transportation Equity: A Case Study in New York City (2019, background): “…2016), because public transit services are meant to be available to all community members, whereas ridesourcing users are more likely to be young, well-educated, and affluent individuals (McGrath 2015; Rayle et al. 2016; A. Smith 2016; Clewlow and Mishra 2017; Gehrke, Felix, and Reardon 2018).”