Culture Of Honor: The Psychology Of Violence In The South

By Richard E. Nisbett, Dov Cohen. 2019

512 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fff83d91c4697545b727c806cf205d38c9d95ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Global Evidence on Economic Preferences* (2018, unknown): “Further unpacking these relationships, negative reciprocity is positively correlated with the number of large domesticable animals, broadly in line with the culture of honor hypothesis (Nisbett and Cohen, 1996; Grosjean, 2014).”
Doing emotions: The role of culture in everyday emotions (2017, background): “…individual’s worth is challenged: Turkish honour ideals emphasise the need to actively defend honour by retaliation (thus promoting anger; see also Nisbett & Cohen, 1996), whereas Japanese face ideals stress the importance of accepting external judgments and co-operating with others to prevent…”
The Making of Violent Extremists (2018, background): “Other individuals may be particularly sensitive to significance loss; they may be rejection-sensitive (Downey & Feldman, 1996), or come from an honor culture (Nisbett & Cohen, 1996) in which no slight, however minimal, is tolerated.”
The science and philosophy of martial arts: exploring the connections between the cognitive, physical, and spiritual aspects of martial arts (2024, unknown): “Strong honor norms are also central to argument-related homicides between male acquaintances, often triggered by a potential loss of face (e.g., public insults, cuckoldry) by one man and the unwillingness of both men to back down from the confrontation (Nisbett and Cohen, 1996).”
Would You Deliver an Electric Shock in 2015? Obedience in the Experimental Paradigm Developed by Stanley Milgram in the 50 Years Following the Original Studies (2017, background): “…empathy influences the verbal expression of doubt by participants during the experiment but did not show any link with the actual level of obedience, and (3) only in respect of men—acceptance of the norms of the culture of honor (Cohen, Nisbett, Bowdle, & Schwartz, 1996; Nisbett & Cohen, 1996).”
Relational mobility and close relationships: A socioecological approach to explain cross‐cultural differences (2017, background): “…wish to introduce a relatively new framework for understanding behavioral patterns and psychological processes, called the socioecological approach (Nisbett & Cohen, 1996; Oishi, 2014; Oishi & Graham, 2010; Oishi, Schug, Yuki, & Axt, 2015; Uskul, Kitayama, & Nisbett, 2008; Yamagishi & Yamagishi,…”