Trends and prospects for local knowledge in ecological and conservation research and monitoring
By R. Brook, S. McLachlan. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2008
277 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, General Health Professions, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fef1cf359a9db6fe1c919a2866870cc14eaaf3c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Placing Transdisciplinarity in Context: A Review of Approaches to Connect Scholars, Society and Action (2019, background): “While ecological and conservation-focused studies that integrate experiential knowledge increased during the 1990s and early 2000s, they often treated knowledge as a set of facts that could be extracted rather than involving local knowledge holders as collaborators [77].”
- Field surveys of the Vulnerable pygmy slow loris Nycticebus pygmaeus using local knowledge in Mondulkiri Province, Cambodia (2011, background): “…used by ecologists in wildlife monitoring, understanding historical and ongoing threatening processes, and collaborative action in conserving wildlife (Steinmetz et al., 2006; Brook & McLachlan, 2008; Jones et al., 2008; Newton et al., 2008; Silvano & Valbo-Jorgensen, 2008; Anadon et al., 2009).”
- Collaborative Engagement of Local and Traditional Knowledge and Science in Marine Environments: A Review (2012, background): “The predominance of articles from North America reflects a similar finding by Brook and McLachlan (2008) in a broad review of the use of LEK in scholarly research.”