Machine Learning Force Fields: Construction, Validation, and Outlook
By V. Botu, Rohit Batra, James Chapman, Rampi Ramprasad. 2016
485 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Force fields developed with machine learning methods in tandem with quantum mechanics are beginning to find merit, given their (i) low cost, (ii) accuracy, and (iii) versatility. Recently, we proposed one such approach, wherein, the vectorial force on an atom is computed directly from its environment. Here, we discuss the multistep workflow required for their construction, which begins with generating diverse reference atomic environments and force data, choosing a numerical representation for the atomic environments, down selecting a representative training set, and lastly the learning method itself, for the case of Al. The constructed force field is then validated by simulating complex materials phenomena such as surface melting and stress–strain behavior, that truly go beyond the realm of ab initio methods, both in length and time scales. To make such force fields truly versatile an attempt to estimate the uncertainty in force predictions is put forth, allowing one to identify areas of poor performance...
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics, Materials Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fe0ec4855136007fa73d306f1ff59365002bc58
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Rohit Batra
- Zhen Zhou
- An Chen
- Xu Zhang
- A. Mannodi‐Kanakkithodi
- Rampi Ramprasad
- Ghanshyam Pilania
- Yuri Mishin
In Computational Mechanics
In Materials Chemistry
- Rohit Batra
- Rampi Ramprasad
- Chiho Kim
- A. Mannodi‐Kanakkithodi
- Ghanshyam Pilania
- Xu Zhang
- Zhen Zhou
- An Chen
Citations in the corpus
- Machine learning for heterogeneous catalyst design and discovery (2018, background): “Therefore, these machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLPs) can speed-up simulations by several orders of magnitude while keeping comparable accuracy to QM methods.(73) The small computational cost of MLPs compared with QM methods promises to make them useful to catalytic systems at extended leng”
- Emerging materials intelligence ecosystems propelled by machine learning (2020, background): “This approach has been successfully used for numerous systems, including elemental bulk materials (such as Al (reFs 125,126 ) , C (reFs 127,128 ) , Li (reF.”