Tagalog Reference Grammar

By Paul Schachter, Fe T. Otanes. 2023

548 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fdb331dc8f051e4f69b46c1a19e7bc1dd04734d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

Citations in the corpus

OT constraints are categorical (2003, methodology): “This is consistent with Tagalog orthographic practice, but not with the actual pronunciation (Schachter & Otanes 1972: 26).”
Framework-Free Grammatical Theory (2009, unknown): “I gave two extended examples from well-known framework-free descriptions of Tagalog and German clause structure, and I noted 7 In Givón (1995), there are two chapters entitled “Taking structure seriously”, in which Givón tries to counter a perceived “grammar denial syndrome” among some functionalist”
Crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns of the allative (2007, background): “I.impf ‘I’ll go to my house without this rain ever touching me.’ comparison Tagalog (Schachter & Otanes 1972: 240, 76) a. mas matanda siya sa kaibigan niya ‘He is older than his friend.’ b. bumalik sa gusali ang bata ‘The child returned to the building.’ result Korean (Jeong-Hwa Lee, personal commun”
The Blackwell Companion to Phonology (2011, background): “Note 11 Similar patterns are found in a number of other Philippine languages (Blust 1971: 85f.; 1979: 104f.; Crowhurst 1998: 597), including Tagalog, where, however, it is poorly attested and classified with irregular verbs (Schachter and Otanes 1972: 375–380).”
Towards Cross-Lingual Generalization of Translation Gender Bias (2021, methodology): “(b) The agreement of the determiners with the gender of the head noun occurs in German and Portuguese but not in the other two LOIs [13, 24, 28, 32].”
Complex Noun Phrases and Linkers (2004, background): “Thus, in Tagalog (discussed in Schachter & Otanes 1972, and Rubin 1994, 2002), we find an apparently free alternation between (iiia) and (iiib), both featuring na/-ng, which Schachter and Otanes (1972:107) call a ‘‘device of linking.’’”
The Role of Phonetic Knowledge in Phonological Patterning: Corpus and Survey Evidence from Tagalog Infixation (2007, background): “Certain Tagalog verbs take the infixes um and in (um is used for actor-focus forms, in for others) to mark realis aspect (um also marks infinitives), as shown in (6) (Schachter & Otanes 1972, French 1988, Prince & Smolensky 1993/2004, McCarthy & Prince 1993).”
The Ordering Distribution of Main and Adverbial Clauses: A Typological Study (2001, unknown): “Tagalog Austronesian Schachter & Otanes 1972 37.”