Arctic Oscillation response to volcanic eruptions in the IPCC AR4 climate models
By Georgiy L. Stenchikov, K. Hamilton, R. Stouffer, A. Robock, V. Ramaswamy, Benjamin D. Santer, H. Graf. 2006
246 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fac687beb94a5d7a93d92bf6542b64d7db62d60
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Georgiy L. Stenchikov
- Doug M. Smith
- T. Delworth
- C. Timmreck
- Luke D. Oman
- K. Lohmann
- Adam A. Scaife
- J. Golaz
In Global and Planetary Change
- Doug M. Smith
- Georgiy L. Stenchikov
- C. Timmreck
- Luke D. Oman
- Adam A. Scaife
- K. Lohmann
- J. Golaz
- M. Winton
Citations in the corpus
- Bi-decadal variability excited in the coupled ocean–atmosphere system by strong tropical volcanic eruptions (2012, background): “Our analyses indicate a rather modest post-eruption continental winter warming (Fig. 7a) compared to other estimates from observations and other simulations (e.g., Graf 1992; Shindell et al. 2004; Stenchikov et al. 2002, 2006; Fischer et al. 2007).”
- A signal-to-noise paradox in climate science (2018, background): “It appears as weak signals in ensemble forecasts(20,23,25,26,28,36) in atmosphere-only simulations forced by prescribed ocean conditions(29,38,39,51,55) and in models subjected to changes in radiative forcing.(59,61,62,74,99) While this review cannot provide absolute proof, it summarises a growing b”
- Nuclear winter revisited with a modern climate model and current nuclear arsenals : Still catastrophic consequences (2007, methodology): “The climate model has been extensively evaluated by our own volcanic cloud simulations [Oman et al., 2005, 2006a, 2006b] and in international intercomparisons as part of the Fourth Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [e.g., Miller et al., 2006; Stenchikov et al., 2006a].”
- The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3 (2011, methodology): “Orographic gravity wave drag is parameterized us-ing Stern and Pierrehumbert (1988), as described in Anderson et al. (2004).”
- Regional climate response to solar-radiation management (2010, background): “and circulation response in models of this class to volcanic forcing may be imperfec”