Impacts of multiple stressors on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: the role of species co‐tolerance

By R. Vinebrooke, K. Cottingham, J. Norberg, Marten Scheffer, S. Dodson, S. Maberly, Ulrich Sommer. 2004

734 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fabaaa53bcaba7bd3fbd74cd3c18695574216fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Research: Is It Relevant to Conservation? (2005, background): “In general, such multiplestressor insurance effects will be strongest when species tolerances to one stressor are positively correlated with tolerances to a subsequent stressor (see Vinebrooke et al. 2004 for a more comprehensive discussion).”
Net effects of multiple stressors in freshwater ecosystems: a meta‐analysis (2016, background): “Theoretical models that predict the combined impact of stressor pairs on populations or communities are often based on an evaluation of the similarity of their independent impacts (Vinebrooke et al., 2004).”
The Causes and Consequences of Compensatory Dynamics in Ecological Communities (2009, background): “Theory and experiments are needed to address whether communities can compensate in the face of multiple stressors (Vinebrooke et al. 2004).”
Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: insights from aquatic systems (2004, background): “A new conceptual framework to analyse the impact of multiple stresses on the functioning of ecosystems is proposed by Vinebrooke et al. (2004).”
Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: emerging issues and their experimental test in aquatic environments (2004, positive): “…of biodiversity has desirable statistical properties; however, in natural ecosystems, local extinction will occur in a nonrandom manner with the highest adverse impact on the rarest species (see above) or on species which are least adapted to cope with a certain stressor (Vinebrooke et al. 2004).”
Quantifying cumulative impacts of human pressures on the marine environment: a geospatial modelling framework (2010, background): “The risk and consequences of cumulative impacts on ecosystems due to the presence of multiple pressures are discussed in a number of theoretical and practical ecological studies (Folt et al. 1999, Folke et al. 2004, Vinebrooke et al. 2004, Christensen et al. 2006, Halpern et al. 2008b).”
Focusing the Meaning(s) of Resilience: Resilience as a Descriptive Concept and a Boundary Object (2007, background): “, hurricanes or floods, as well as possible multiplicative effects (Vinebrooke et al. 2004).”
Effects of experimental warming and increased ultraviolet B radiation on the Mediterranean plankton food web (2011, background): “Responses of organisms to a stressor can occur at the individual level as physiological acclimation (Portner and Farrell 2008) and depend on the tolerance of the species to the stressor (Vinebrooke et al. 2004).”
Microbial diversity and ecological networks as indicators of environmental quality (2017, background): “When a disturbance occurs, biotic interactions may be affected together with organisms and in turn affect the regulation of diversity (Vinebrooke et al. 2004) (Fig.”
Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity (2018, background): “For example, Vinebrooke et al. (2004) illustrated how lake community composition could reduce or increase combined stressor response depending on the extent to which species shared stress tolerance.”