Complexifier coherent states for quantum general relativity

By T. Thiemann. 2002

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recently, substantial amount of activity in quantum general relativity (QGR) has focused on the semiclassical analysis of the theory. In this paper, we want to comment on two such developments: (1) polymer-like states for Maxwell theory and linearized gravity constructed by Varadarajan which use much of the Hilbert space machinery that has proved useful in QGR, and (2) coherent states for QGR, based on the general complexifier method, with built-in semiclassical properties. We show the following. (A) Varadarajan's states are complexifier coherent states. This unifies all states constructed so far under the general complexifier principle. (B) Ashtekar and Lewandowski suggested a non-Abelian generalization of Varadarajan's states to QGR which, however, are no longer of the complexifier type. We construct a new class of non-Abelian complexifiers which come close to that underlying Varadarajan's construction. (C) Non-Abelian complexifiers close to Varadarajan's induce new types of Hilbert spaces which do not support the operator algebra of QGR. The analysis suggests that if one sticks to the present kinematical framework of QGR and if kinematical coherent states are at all useful, then normalizable, graph-dependent states must be used which are produced by the complexifier method as well. (D) Present proposals for states with mildened graph dependence, obtained by performing a graph average, do not approximate well coordinate-dependent observables. However, graph-dependent states, whether averaged or not, seem to be well suited for the semiclassical analysis of QGR with respect to coordinate-independent operators.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fa1913bdda8bd31ae248853f419f244b2953ab4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Alejandro Perez
  2. Carlo Rovelli
  3. Abhay Ashtekar
  4. Yongge Ma
  5. Muxin Han
  6. Weiming Huang
  7. H. Sahlmann
  8. T. Thiemann

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Alejandro Perez
  2. Abhay Ashtekar
  3. Carlo Rovelli
  4. T. Thiemann
  5. H. Sahlmann
  6. Simone Speziale
  7. Yongge Ma
  8. Muxin Han

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Alejandro Perez
  2. Carlo Rovelli
  3. Abhay Ashtekar
  4. T. Thiemann
  5. Yongge Ma
  6. Muxin Han
  7. Weiming Huang
  8. Eugenio Bianchi

Citations in the corpus