Lower bound limit analysis of slabs with nonlinear yield criteria

By Kristian Krabbenhøft, Lars Damkilde. 2002

57 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f8fb299cd2296c6023564cbb34894cd767efed7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

1. Hung Nguyen-Xuan
2. C. Le
3. H. Askes
4. Andrei Lyamin
5. Matthew Gilbert
6. Kristian Krabbenhøft
7. Scott W. Sloan
8. H. Nguyen‐Dang

In Mechanics of Materials

1. C. Le
2. Hung Nguyen-Xuan
3. H. Askes
4. Matthew Gilbert
5. Timon Rabczuk
6. Andrei Lyamin
7. Gabriele Milani
8. Antonio Tralli

In Statistics and Probability

1. C. Le
2. Hung Nguyen-Xuan
3. H. Askes
4. Matthew Gilbert
5. Andrei Lyamin
6. Scott W. Sloan
7. Antonio Tralli
8. Gabriele Milani

Citations in the corpus

• Homogenization approach for the limit analysis of out-of-plane loaded masonry walls (2006, methodology): “This triangular element has been preferred rather than more accurate elements, proposed by Krenk et al. (1994) and Krabbenhoft and Damkilde (2002), due to its simplicity and the low number of unknowns involved in the optimization.”
• Second-Order Cone and Semidefinite Representations of Material Failure Criteria (2007, background): “Limit analysis problems under the nonlinear Nielsen criteria have been solved in [59] by a general IPM formulation.”
• Upper and lower bound limit analysis of plates using FEM and second-order cone programming (2010, background): “Consequently, over last few decades various numerical approaches based on bound theorems and mathematical programming have been developed [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10].”
• Formulation and solution of some plasticity problems as conic programs (2007, methodology): “For the limit analysis of laterally loaded plates the element proposed by Krabbenhøft and Damkilde (2002) is used.”
• Limit analysis of plates and slabs using a meshless equilibrium formulation (2010, methodology): “Note that for convenience in each case the whole plate or slab problem has been solved, obviating the need to consider symmetry boundary conditions (these can be complicated to treat in the static formulation [31]).”
• An interior‐point algorithm for elastoplasticity (2007, background): “In perfect plasticity a particularly powerful feature is the possibility of computing rigorous upper and lower bounds on the exact collapse load [33–40].”