Ecological Modernization and Its Critics: Assessing the Past and Looking Toward the Future

By D. Fisher, W. Freudenburg. 2001

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f873ba6a6260f0f713995b11cfd619de3e6c960

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Richard York
2. S. Pulver
3. E. Rosa

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Richard York
2. S. Pulver

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Richard York
2. S. Pulver
3. E. Rosa
4. Andrew K. Jorgenson
5. Ahmet Atıl Aşıcı

Citations in the corpus

• Key Challenges to Ecological Modernization Theory (2003, background): “The tradition has established a clear theoretical and empirical program, has evolved through various stages of development, and has engaged the critiques of scholars from a variety of perspectives (Fisher & Freudenburg, 2001; Mol & Sonnenfeld, 2000a, 2000b; Mol & Spaargaren, 2000).”
• Understanding the Jevons paradox (2016, background): “…by advances in technology and organizational restructuring, have the potential to dematerialize production and provide for an ever-expanding economy with lower energy use and declining carbon dioxide emissions (Hawken, Lovins, and Hunter Lovins 1999; Andersen 2002; Fisher and Freudenburg 2001).”
• Making Sense of Corporate Environmentalism (2007, background): “…around two competing theories of the economy-environment interface: the treadmill of production model and ecological modernization theory (Buttel, 2000, 2004; Fisher & Freudenberg, 2001; Freudenberg, 2005a, 2005b; Mol & Spaargaren, 2000; Schnaiberg et al., 2002; York, 2004; York & Rosa, 2003).”