The Role and Interpretation of Pilot Studies in Clinical Research

By A. Leon, L. Davis, H. Kraemer. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 2010

1,870 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Pilot studies represent a fundamental phase of the research process. The purpose of conducting a pilot study is to examine the feasibility of an approach that is intended to be used in a larger scale study. The roles and limitations of pilot studies are described here using a clinical trial as an example. A pilot study can be used to evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, randomization, retention, assessment procedures, new methods, and implementation of the novel intervention. A pilot study is not a hypothesis testing study. Safety, efficacy and effectiveness are not evaluated in a pilot. Contrary to tradition, a pilot study does not provide a meaningful effect size estimate for planning subsequent studies due to the imprecision inherent in data from small samples. Feasibility results do not necessarily generalize beyond the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the pilot design. A pilot study is a requisite initial step in exploring a novel intervention or an innovative application of an intervention. Pilot results can inform feasibility and identify modifications needed in the design of a larger, ensuing hypothesis testing study. Investigators should be forthright in stating these objectives of a pilot study. Grant reviewers and other stakeholders should expect no more.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f724faa6227cc61e6340de2d2e1ce17d209d992

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. D. Almirall
  2. Daniël Lakens
  3. Meredith Gunlicks-Stoessel
  4. N. Duan
  5. Susan A. Murphy
  6. Scott N. Compton
  7. Eric A. Cator
  8. Erik van Zwet

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Helen Christensen
  2. Judith Proudfoot
  3. Eric A. Cator
  4. Erik van Zwet
  5. Daniël Lakens
  6. Marielle Stel

In Statistics and Probability

  1. D. Almirall
  2. Casper J. Albers
  3. Meredith Gunlicks-Stoessel
  4. N. Duan
  5. Scott N. Compton
  6. Daniël Lakens
  7. Helen Christensen
  8. Susan A. Murphy

Citations in the corpus