Are we getting there? Evidence of decentralized forest management from the Tanzanian Miombo woodlands

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The forbidden fuel: Charcoal, urban woodfuel demand and supply dynamics, community forest management and woodfuel policy in Malawi (2010, unknown): “CBFM faces significant challenges in Malawi (Blaikie, 2006; Jere et al., 2000; Kayambazinthu and Locke, 2002; Zulu, 2008, 2009a) and elsewhere (e.g., Campbell et al., 2001; Shackleton et al., 2002), but lessons have also been learnt to improve it (e.g., Lund and Treue, 2008).”
Charcoal, livelihoods, and poverty reduction: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa (2013, background): “For instance, CBFM approaches and enabling laws and policies are generally seen as having the potential to empower local communities and enhance tenure security, inclusion, user rights and access to forest resources, local decision-making and capacity for self reliance, equity, and social justice (A”
Participatory Forest Management in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania: Who Benefits? (2009, methodology): “However, as indicated by evidence in this study and supported by a number of detailed inventory studies (Lund and Treue 2008, Luoga et al. 2005), the fact that CBFM promotes sustainable utilisation of forest products and appears to improve forest condition (see below) means that it is likely to…”