Statistical Methods for Dynamic Treatment Regimes: Reinforcement Learning, Causal Inference, and Personalized Medicine
By Bibhas Chakraborty. 2013
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Eric B. Laber
- Kristin A. Linn
- Michael R. Kosorok
- Daniel J. Lizotte
- Leonard A. Stefanski
- Ying‐Qi Zhao
- D. Almirall
- Chao Yu
Citations in the corpus
- Learning Optimal Fair Policies (2018, methodology): “In healthcare, the problem of learning optimal policies is studied under the heading of dynamic treatment regimes (Chakraborty and Moodie 2013).”
- TREE-BASED REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FOR ESTIMATING OPTIMAL DYNAMIC TREATMENT REGIMES (2018, background): “particular, the problem of developing optimal multi-stage decisions has strong resemblance to reinforcement learning (RL) (Chakraborty and Moodie, 2013).”
- Interactive Q-learning for Quantiles (2017, methodology): “As pr(Y > λ) = E(1Y>λ), many approaches exist for estimating an optimal regime that maximizes the value function of the binary outcome 1Y>λ; one example is discrete Q-learning (Chakraborty and Moodie 2013).”
- Dynamic treatment regimes: technical challenges and applications (2014, methodology): “Other indirect methods include Q-learning (Murphy, 2005b; Chakraborty and Moodie, 2013; Qian et al., 2013; Chakraborty and Murphy, 2014; Laber et al., 2014), A-learning (Murphy, 2003; Robins, 2004), and regret-regression (Henderson et al., 2009).”
- Q-learning Residual Analysis: Application to The Effectiveness of Sequences of Antipsychotic Medications for Patients with Schizophrenia (2016, unknown): “The issue of model checking for Q-learning has been discussed in [17] where it was shown that the residuals of the standard Q-learning may not be used to detect the omission of important variables that interact with the treatment indicator in predicting the outcome.”