Automated Media: An Institutional Theory Perspective on Algorithmic Media Production and Consumption

By Philip M. Napoli. 2014

340 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Mike Ananny
2. Michael Latzer
3. Natascha Just
4. Kate Crawford
5. Göran Bolin
6. Jonas Andersson Schwarz

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Mike Ananny
2. Michael Latzer
3. Natascha Just
4. Kate Crawford
5. Göran Bolin
6. Jonas Andersson Schwarz
7. Maranke Wieringa
8. Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

In Urban Studies

1. Mike Ananny
2. Michael Latzer
3. Natascha Just
4. Kate Crawford
5. Göran Bolin
6. Jonas Andersson Schwarz

Citations in the corpus

• Governance by algorithms: reality construction by algorithmic selection on the Internet (2017, background): “From a media perspective, algorithmic selection significantly influences both media production and media consumption (Napoli, 2014).”
• Heuristics of the algorithm: Big Data, user interpretation and institutional translation (2015, background): “With algorithmically based marketing, however, these ideas of the audience have changed in fundamental ways (Bermejo, 2009; Napoli, 2014).”
• Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability (2018, background): “…al., 2015), elite structuring masked as emergent sociality (Mackenzie, 2015; Striphas, 2015), automated media circulation (Hallinan and Striphas, 2014; Napoli, 2014), optimized labor (Kushner, 2013) and financial markets (Arnoldi, 2015), bracketed research methods (Driscoll and Walker, 2014), and…”