Coherence and Coreference Revisited

By Andrew Kehler, Laura Kertz, Hannah Rohde, Jeffrey L. Elman. Journal of Semantics, 2007

418 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f27d3fb8df22ede0de4153b1ff4f2676db0fae7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Establishing coherence relations in discourse: The influence of implicit causality and connectives on pronoun resolution (2013, background): “In most studies this is interpreted as an early effect. relation) and that readers need to adjust this expectation after encountering and (cf. Kehler et al., 2008).”
Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review (2010, background): “Recent work on coherence relations (Kehler, Kertz, Rohde, & Elman, 2008 ) can be seen as one attempt at integrating the more formal theory of focus structure with a more elaborate theory of how discourse works.”
Grammatical and information-structural influences on pronoun production (2014, methodology): “Kehler et al. (2008) offered an explanation for the apparent contradiction by modeling the relationship between production and interpretation in terms of Bayes’ Rule, as shown in (3).”
Simple Coreference Resolution with Rich Syntactic and Semantic Features (2009, background): “While appositives and related syntactic constructions can resolve some cases of non-pronominal reference, most cases require semantic knowledge about the various entities as well as the verbs used in conjunction with those entities to disambiguate references (Kehler et al., 2008).”
The Winograd Schema Challenge and Reasoning about Correlation (2015, background): “Examples may include general coreference resolution (Kehler et al. 2008), temporal anaphora resolution (Lascarides and Asher 1993), and lexical disambiguation (Asher and Lascarides 1995).”
Why discourse affects speakers’ choice of referring expressions (2015, methodology): “While we have assumed this word probability to be constant across words and referents, Kehler et al. (2008) use grammatical position to define this probability and show that their model captures experimental data.”
Tackling Winograd Schemas by Formalizing Relevance Theory in Knowledge Graphs (2014, background): “Such biases are described by Kehler et al. (2008) who describe that pronoun interpretation is inﬂuenced by which coherence relations are likely to appear and which expectations about following entities are likely to occur.”
Coreference and discourse coherence in L2: The roles of grammatical aspect and referential form (2017, methodology): “, subject preference) that may be at work (e.g., Arnold, 2001; Kaiser, 2011; Kehler et al., 2008; Rohde & Kehler, 2014; Stevenson et al., 1994).”