The role of values in collaborative consumption: insights from a product-service system for lending and borrowing in the UK
By L. Piscicelli, T. Cooper, Tom Fisher. 2015
393 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f03e6abdbf8873b379ae500b4148bc2f1a28f6b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Julian Kirchherr
- Ruth Carrasco-Gallego
- Gustavo Morales-Alonso
- Meisam Ranjbari
- Marko P. Hekkert
- Thomas Wastling
- Fiona Charnley
- Mariale Moreno
In Sociology and Political Science
- Ruth Carrasco-Gallego
- Gustavo Morales-Alonso
- Meisam Ranjbari
- Thomas Wastling
- Fiona Charnley
- Mariale Moreno
- Johanna Mair
- Daan Schraven
Citations in the corpus
- Conceptualizing the Sharing Economy through Presenting a Comprehensive Framework (2018, background): “Servitization is considered an enabler for the SE business models [17] but it is also strongly linked with the circular economy paradigm [18–20].”
- What makes a sustainable business model successful? : An empirical comparison of two peer-to-peer goods-sharing platforms (2018, neutral): “3 Piscicelli et al. (2015) found that users of UK-based goods-sharing platform Ecomodo prioritised self-transcendence and openness to change values e which typically drive pro-social and pro-environmental behaviour e over self-enhancement and conservation values.”
- Diversifying and de-growing the circular economy: Radical social transformation in a resource-scarce world (2016, result): “Despite research that shows the challenges and limits of sustainable see Piscicelli et al., 2015), the role of the citizen thus appears to be fundamentally one of accepting or rejecting new and diverse business models, in line with re-jigged product and service life cycles.”
- Understanding the intention to buy secondhand clothing on sharing economy platforms: The influence of sustainability, distance from the consumption system, and economic motivations (2020, neutral): “…at the antecedents of online collaborative consumption from a consumer perspective (Benoit et al., 2017; Hamari, 2013; Hamari et al., 2016; Hofmann, Hartl, & Penz, 2017; Lang & Joyner Armstrong, 2018; Lee et al., 2018; Möhlmann, 2015; Perren & Kozinets, 2018; Piscicelli, Cooper, & Fisher, 2015).”
- The battle of the buzzwords: A comparative review of the circular economy and the sharing economy concepts (2021, background): “Product-service systems enable access to company-owned assets and facilitate the provision of privately owned assets (Piscicelli et al., 2015).”
- Design for Circular Behaviour: Considering Users in a Circular Economy (2018, background): “The first is that it is acknowledged that there has been limited progression of circular business models in a B2C domain [86], hence making it difficult to find strong case study examples.”
- The Passions and the Interests: Unpacking the 'Sharing Economy' (2016, background): “(Piscicelli et al., 2015) Journal Article Recirculation of goods Motivation, values, acceptance Empirical study Mixed qualitative and quantitative study (in depth interviews and survey among users of Ecomodo, a UK-based online marketplace where people can lend and borrow each other's objec”
- Understanding Collaborative Consumption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior with Value-Based Personal Norms (2017, neutral): “…Behavior with… 683 norms.4 Although little is known about the underlying processes that determine the influence of values on collaborative consumption, Piscicelli et al. (2015) find collaborative consumers score higher on self-transcendence (altruistic and biospheric) than on self-enhancement…”
- Capturing the dynamics of the sharing economy: Institutional research on the plural forms and practices of sharing economy organizations (2017, background): “They have instead focused on aspects such as the antecedents of sharing and motivations for it (Bucher et al., 2016; Hellwig et al., 2015; Lamberton and Rose, 2012; Möhlmann, 2015; Piscicelli et al., 2015), competition (Cusumano, 2014), and the governance of users (Hartl et al.”