Decision-Making in Meetings as Talk-in-Interaction

By M. Huisman. 2001

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9efeaff6c123469387a38dbb790a8affbe58db74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. A. Peräkylä
2. Jan Svennevig
3. Melisa Stevanovic
4. Birte Asmuß

In Language and Linguistics

1. A. Peräkylä
2. Melisa Stevanovic
3. Jan Svennevig
4. Birte Asmuß
5. E. Weiste

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. A. Peräkylä
2. Jan Svennevig
3. Melisa Stevanovic
4. Birte Asmuß

Citations in the corpus

• Meeting Talk (2009, background): “Huisman (2001) shows that what counts as a decision in a meeting context is negotiable.”
• Establishing joint decisions in a dyad (2012, background): “Email: melisa.stevanovic@helsinki.fi (2)(Huisman, 2001: 73) I’ve got another question uhm (.)”
• Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide (2012, background): “However, another layer of temporality is also involved in meetings, which entails talking and deciding about more distant future activities, as well as building a joint commitment to them (Huisman, 2001, p. 75).”