The Program Evaluation Standards: A Guide for Evaluators and Evaluation Users

By D. Yarbrough, L. Shulha, R. Hopson, Flora A Caruthers. 2010

504 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9eea4b04e6de40751ced90d24250f3cbf4fc2a1b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. G. Cizek

Citations in the corpus

• Validating test score meaning and defending test score use: different aims, different methods (2016, background): “…the kinds of concerns that arise in the context of test use; namely, the merit, worth, or signi fi cance of the object of evaluation (Scriven, 1995); they are typically concerned with aspects such as utility, feasibility, propriety and accuracy (Yarbrough, Shulha, Hopson, & Caruthers, 2011).”
• A Documentary Evaluation of Offline AI Integration in Teacher-in-a-Box OER Programmes for Low-Connectivity Schools (2026, unknown): “• Accountability documentation: evaluation reasoning and decision trails are documented to support internal metaevaluation and responsible use, consistent with evaluation standards that emphasise transparency, consequences, and documentation [33].”