Supermassive black holes in elliptical galaxies: switching from very bright to very dim

By E. Churazov, S. Sazonov, R. Sunyaev, W. Forman, C. Jones, H. Böhringer. 2005

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Relativistic outflows (mainly observed in the radio) are a characteristic feature of both Galactic stellar-mass black holes and supermassive black holes (SMBHs). Simultaneous radio and X-ray observations of Galactic sources have shown that the outflow is strong at low accretion rates, but it weakens dramatically or disappears completely at high accretion rates, manifesting structural changes in the accretion flow. It is reasonable to assume that SMBHs follow the same trend. For low-luminosity SMBHs in nearby elliptical galaxies and clusters, recent observations strongly suggest that the outflows play the central role in keeping the gas hot (mechanical feedback). If the outflow is quenched in SMBHs at high accretion rates similarly to the behaviour of Galactic sources, then the straightforward consequence is a relatively weak feedback of rapidly accreting SMBHs. We argue that elliptical galaxies and their central engines should then evolve through two stages. Early on, the central SMBH rapidly grows by accreting cooling gas at a near-Eddington rate with high radiative efficiency but with weak feedback on the infalling gas. This stage terminates when the black hole has grown to a sufficiently large mass that its feedback (radiative and/or mechanical), despite the low gas heating efficiency, is able to suppress gas cooling. After that the system switches to a stable state corresponding to passively evolving ellipticals, when the accretion rate and radiative efficiency are very low, but the gas heating efficiency is high and energy input from the relativistic outflow keeps the gas hot.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ee735d414148118826e7cd498eceefad4605d2a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. Volker Springel
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. T. Naab
  5. Simon D. M. White
  6. Thomas J. Cox
  7. R. Dav'e
  8. M. Vogelsberger

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. T. Naab
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. Jeremiah P. Ostriker
  4. R. Somerville
  5. J. Devriendt
  6. L. Hernquist
  7. Y. Dubois
  8. D. M. Alexander

Citations in the corpus