Do Labor Market Networks Have an Important Spatial Dimension
By J. Hellerstein, Mark J. Kutzbach, David Neumark. 2013
129 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9eb8022ed096d9e9a0aeddd978fdcf29df06cd04
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- W. Strange
- Stuart S. Rosenthal
- Patrick Sharkey
- G. Galster
- Gilles Duranton
- William R. Kerr
- Edward L. Glaeser
- Pierre-Philippe Combes
In Sociology and Political Science
- W. Strange
- Stuart S. Rosenthal
- Patrick Sharkey
- G. Galster
- Edward L. Glaeser
- William R. Kerr
- S. Musterd
- Roger Andersson
Citations in the corpus
- Spatial Foundations of Inequality: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Overview (2017, background): “…jobs is shown to be less important than the prevalence of jobs held by other blacks, suggesting that discrimination and employment networks may be more relevant than the raw presence of jobs in explaining racial gaps in employment (see also Hellerstein, Kutzbach, and Neumark 2014; Waldinger 1996).”
- How Close Is Close? The Spatial Reach of Agglomeration Economies (2020, methodology): “Moreover, and also using matched employer-employee data, Hellerstein et al (2014) show that job turnover and wages vary with social connections within a residential neighborhood in ways that support the idea that increased neighborhood connectedness enhances worker productivity.”