Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does submit prime permit?

By K. Forster, Tamiko Azuma. 2000

73 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e9d8bce27494933ad79ddb1179d5e78a67a5e07

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Productivity and priming: Morphemic decomposition in Arabic (2011, unknown): “Of particular relevance here is a study by Forster and Azuma (2000), showing that masked priming between pairs sharing a bound stem (e.g., permit/submit, reflect/inflect) depends on the productivity of that stem.”
Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography (2008, background): “2 Further suggestive evidence for this conclusion comes from research conducted by Forster and Azuma (2000), who reported masked priming effects for prefixed items that shared a bound stem (e.g., debate-REBATE).”
Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic (2005, methodology): “…organising property of lexical representation and processing (Caramazza, Laudanna, & Romani, 1988; Clahsen, 1999; Feldman, Frost, & Pnini, 1995; Forster & Azuma, 2000; Marslen-Wilson, Tyler, Waksler, & Older 1994; Rueckl, Mikolinski, Raveh, Miner, & Mars, 1997; Schreuder & Baayen, 1995;…”
Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew (2005, background): “The studies in English used previews that shared a morpheme with the target word and found no greater benefit from these previews than from control previews that shared as many letters with the target (in the same positions) as the morphemic previews.”
Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? (2004, background): “However, this argument only stands if we accept that orthographic and phonological priming effects combine additively, an issue that has been challenged recently (e.g., in terms of morphological and form priming; see Forster & Azuma, 2000).”