Preserving Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms: Asset or Liability? The Moderating Role of Business Context
By Lucia Naldi, Carmelo Cennamo, G. Corbetta, Luis R. Gómez-Mejía. 2013
305 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e8ddd99f5cde5177c42a595793cd28978017361
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Luis R. Gómez-Mejía
- C. Cruz
- I. Neacşu
- María Concepción López-Fernández
- Soumodip Sarkar
- Remedios Hernández‐Linares
- Clay Dibrell
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Luis R. Gómez-Mejía
- C. Cruz
- I. Neacşu
- María Concepción López-Fernández
- Soumodip Sarkar
- Remedios Hernández‐Linares
- Clay Dibrell
Citations in the corpus
- “SEW” What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Review of Socioemotional Wealth and a Way Forward (2020, background): “Indeed, extant research has conceptualized SEW as both a positive and a negative influence on strategic decision making and related outcomes, whereby SEW can serve as both an asset and a liability for family firms (e.g., Naldi et al., 2013).”
- The effect of socioemotional wealth on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and family business performance (2019, methodology): “Finally, our finding that concern for SEW preservation has a positive impact on the relationship between risk taking and family firm performance and a negative impact on the link between innovativeness and family business performance strengthens the prior findings that SEW has both negative and posi”
- Is nepotism so bad for family firms? A socioemotional wealth approach (2018, background): “…on the relationship between nepotistic hiring at the top and firm performance, with a few exceptions it has not provided theoretical explanations about the contextual conditions that influence the relationship between nepotism and firm performance (Jaskiewicz & Luchak, 2013; Naldi et al., 2013).”