Shading by invasive shrub reduces seed production and pollinator services in a native herb

By Amy M. McKinney, K. Goodell. Biological Invasions, 2010

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Conserving Pollinators in North American Forests: A Review (2016, background): “…impact herbaceous plant cover and diversity (e.g., Woods 1993; Baker and Van Lear 1998; Collier et al. 2002; Gerber et al. 2008; Hudson et al. 2014) and, in turn, pollinators (McKinney and Goodell 2010; Hanula et al. 2011a, 2011b; Fielder et al. 2012; Hudson et al. 2013; Hanula et al. 2015).”
Current mismatch between research and conservation efforts: The need to study co-occurring invasive plant species (2013, background): “, 2002) or by creating shaded, unfavorable habitats for pollinators (McKinney and Goodell, 2010).”
Have changing forests conditions contributed to pollinator decline in the southeastern United States (2015, background): “…been shown to negatively impact herbaceous plant cover and diversity (e.g., Woods, 1993; Baker and Van Lear, 1998; Collier and Vankat, 2002; Gerber et al., 2008; Hudson et al., 2014) and pollinators (McKinney and Goodell, 2010; Hanula and Horn, 2011a,b; Fielder et al., 2012; Hudson et al., 2013).”
Behavioral consequences of plant invasion: an invasive plant alters rodent antipredator behavior (2010, background): “Behavioral changes caused by L. maackii may also affect other ecological interactions, such as nest predation (e.g., Schmidt and Whelan 1999; Rodewald et al. 2010), pollination (McKinney and Goodell, 2010) and disease risk (Allen B, personal communication), with largely unknown consequences.”