Lessons from the JMCB Archive

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Open Access to Data: An Ideal Professed but Not Practised (2014, background): “Policy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.008 esources (Hamermesh, 1997; McCullough et al., 2006; Mirowski nd Sklivas, 1991).”
Evidence-based policymaking: promise, challenges and opportunities for accounting and financial markets research** (2018, unknown): “McCullough et al. (2006) report that only 22% of 62 macroeconomic studies could be successfully replicated, despite data and code archives.”
High Noon for Microfinance Impact Evaluations: Re-investigating the Evidence from Bangladesh (2012, methodology): “While used in various ways, and sometimes interchangeably, we generally use reproduction to mean using different methods applied to the same raw data, and replication to mean using the same (or very similar) methods (McCullough et al., 2006).”
Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research (2018, unknown): “…is typically little to no verification that the data and code submitted to journals actually generate the published results; and the majority of economics journals still have no explicit data sharing requirements ( McCullough, McGeary, and Harrison 2006; Anderson et al. 2008; McCullough 2009).”