Baseline, leakage and measurement issues: how do forestry and energy projects compare?

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evolution of international carbon markets: lessons for the Paris Agreement (2019, background): “Chomitz (2002) and Geres and Michaelowa (2002) stressed the risk of carbon leakage and the need for monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV).”
Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program (2012, background): “The magnitude of these effects should depend on the elasticity of the corresponding demand (e.g., as demonstrated by Chomitz 2002).”
A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change (2009, background): “There, the costs of production may be lower, but carbon is still emitted in the production of chemicals and in the transportation of the chemicals to European locations (Chomitz, 2002).”
The Economics of the Kyoto Protocol (2003, background): “E.g., Chomitz (2002) argues that from a carbon perspective the differences between energy and land-use projects are far less clear and systematic than often supposed, and Pandey (2002) makes a strong case that agroforestry in developing countries could have large ancillary benefits for host…”