Isoperimetry of Waists and Concentration of Maps

By Misha Gromov. 2003

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Let f : Sn → Rk be a continuous map where Sn is the unit n-sphere. Then there exists a point z ∈ Rk such that the spherical n-volumes of the e-neighbours of the level Yz = f−1(z) ⊂ Sn, denoted Yz + e ⊂ Sn, satisfy Vol(Yz + e) ≥ Vol(Sn−k + e) ( )Sn for all e > 0, where Sn−k ⊂ Sn denotes an equatorial (n− k)-sphere. This is proven in §5.9. Remarks. (a) If k = n, and card f−1(z) ≤ 2, z ∈ Rn, then ( )Sn applied to e = π/2 amounts to the Borsuk–Ulam theorem: some level f−1(z) of f : Sn → Rk equals a pair of opposite points. Not surprisingly, our argument in the general case depends on Z2-cohomological considerations. (b) If k = 1 one may take the Levy mean of f for z ∈ R, where the level f−1(z) ⊂ Sn divides the sphere into equal halves (i.e. where Vol(f−1(−∞, z]) and Vol(f−1[z,∞)) are both ≥ 12 Vol(Sn)). Then ( )SN follows from the spherical isoperimetric inequality (see 9.2.B). (c) The inequality ( )Sn for e → 0 shows that the Minkowski m-volume of f−1(z) for m = n − k is ≥ than that of the equatorial sphere Sm ⊂ Sn. Yet, it remains unclear if some level of f has the Hausdorff measure ≥ Volm(S). (If f is a generic smooth map, a level with Haumesm ≥ Volm(S) is delivered by the Almgren–Morse theory, see [Gr5].)

Subfields: Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e73ae93261043a0c721f77e631a130a78daf379

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

  1. Antoine Song
  2. Larry Guth
  3. F. C. Marques
  4. A. Neves
  5. Xin Zhou
  6. Debora Impera
  7. Christos Mantoulidis
  8. Otis Chodosh

Citations in the corpus