The evolution of nestling discrimination by hosts of parasitic birds: why is rejection so rare?

By T. Grim. 2006

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e6b62ade97f970cd39cd061dacc0589755e0b9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Andrew F. Russell
2. A. Cockburn
3. N. Langmore
4. R. Kilner
5. T. H. Clutton-Brock
6. W. Koenig
7. Nicholas B. Davies
8. Janis Dickinson

Citations in the corpus

• Flexible cuckoo chick-rejection rules in the superb fairy-wren (2009, background): “However, such phenotypic recognition cues may be of limited (or secondary) use to cuckoo hosts (Planque et al. 2002; Lawes and Marthews 2003; Grim 2006; Britton et al. 2007) because of constraints such as changes in nestling phenotype over time (Davies and Brooke 1988), lack of opportunity for…”