GUIDEBOOK FOR ASSESSING THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

By D. Forkenbrock, Shauna M. Benshoff, G. Weisbrod. 2001

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e5fb07664cf48dfff5022220f5fe3d9a08adc3e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs (2015, background): “Transit can support economic development in several ways (Banister and Thurstain-Goodwin 2011; Cambridge Systematics 1998; CTOD 2011; Forkenbrock and Weisbrod 2001; ECONorthwest and PBQD 2002; Litman 2004a; EDRG 2007).”
Transportation Decision Making: Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming (2007, background): “Evaluation studies are typically needed for at least one of the following reasons (USDOT, 1994; Forkenbrock and Weisbrod, 2001)”
Effects of Transportation Accessibility on Residential Property Values (2009, unknown): “The hedonic price model is a multivariate regression model for housing values, as well as a common robust indirect approach to valuation in that its estimates represent the implied prices that people place on obtaining desirable features of a property and avoiding undesirable ones (20, 36).”
Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Alternative Passenger Vehicles (2014, unknown): “According to a comprehensive guidebook published by the Transportation Research Board on the socio-economic effects of transportation projects, travel time, safety, vehicle operating cost, noise, and congestion are listed among the prominent socio-economic metrics [16].”
Models to predict the economic development impact of transportation projects: historical experience and new applications (2008, background): “The separate valuation of traveler, economic and other social impacts, as shown here, is made stressed in the NCHRP Guidebook for Assessing Social and Economic Impacts of Transportation Projects (Forkenbrock and Weisbrod, 2001) and the internet guide to transportation benefit/cost analysis (Californ”
Economic Value of Walkability (2003, unknown): “Equity benefits are difficult to monetize (there is no easy way to add equity benefits to other benefits such as vehicle cost savings or increased property values), but most communities seem to place a high value on achieving equity objectives (Forkenbrock and Weisbrod 2001).”