Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review

By M. Martínez‐Harms, P. Balvanera. 2012

613 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e5738b6a09a5b5ec192ef6896fd2dfca584b44f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation (2013, methodology): “Unlike ad hoc methods for quantifying ecosystem services (e.g., Egoh et al., 2012; Martinez-Harms and Balvanera, 2012), this new generation of analytical tools is intended to enable replicable and quantifiable ecosystem services analyses.”
Mapping social–ecological systems: Identifying ‘green-loop’ and ‘red-loop’ dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use (2015, background): “While recent years have seen a concerted research effort into the spatial exploration and mapping of ES (Kareiva et al., 2011; Martínez-Harms and Balvanera, 2012), maps of social–ecological systems are much harder to find.”
Global 10 m Land Use Land Cover Datasets: A Comparison of Dynamic World, World Cover and Esri Land Cover (2022, background): “, as the basis for ecosystem service accounting [7,8]; isolating urban areas from their background to quantify local climate impacts [9]; informing spatial species distribution models that can predict and inform biodiversity conservation [10,11]; spatial conservation planning and environmental impac”
Monetary accounting of ecosystem services: a test case for Limburg province, the Netherlands. (2015, background): “Very few biophysical ES models have been validated (Martínez-Harms and Balvanera, 2012), and uncertainty in many current ES maps is high (Schulp et al., 2014).”
A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services (2013, background): “Recently, Martı́nez-Harms and Balvanera (2012) call for a”
Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica (2013, background): “1), with primary information, land-cover proxies or causal relationships (Martínez-Harms & Balvanera 2012).”
Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research (2019, neutral): “and Balvanera [22] Patch 10–10(2) km(2) Local 10(2)–10(3) km(2)”
Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification (2014, background): “2.3 Ecosystem service demands and flows Studies and models on the supply side of ecosystem services on different scales have developed quite far already (see reviews by Crossman et al. 2013; Martínez-Harms & Balvanera 2012; Egoh et al. 2012).”
A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services (2014, methodology): “The spatial scale of the case study was determined following the criteria provided by Martínez-Harms and Balvanera (2012) (Table 1) according to the size of the study area.”