A Bernstein-type inequality for stochastic processes of quadratic forms of Gaussian variables
By Ikhlef Bechar. 2009
136 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We introduce a Bernstein-type inequality which serves to uniformly control quadratic forms of gaussian variables. The latter can for example be used to derive sharp model selection criteria for linear estimation in linear regression and linear inverse problems via penalization, and we do not exclude that its scope of application can be made even broader.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Finance, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e2dc4564b3adeb685594c15303df9627525ebf8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
- Laurent Jacob
- Wing-Kin Ma
- Martin J. Wainwright
- Anthony Man-Cho So
- Miles E. Lopes
- Kun-Yu Wang
- Tsung-Hui Chang
- Chong-Yung Chi
In Finance
- Laurent Jacob
- Wing-Kin Ma
- Martin J. Wainwright
- Anthony Man-Cho So
- Miles E. Lopes
- Kun-Yu Wang
- Tsung-Hui Chang
- Chong-Yung Chi
In Statistics and Probability
- Laurent Jacob
- Martin J. Wainwright
- Wing-Kin Ma
- Anthony Man-Cho So
- Miles E. Lopes
- Kun-Yu Wang
- Tsung-Hui Chang
- Chong-Yung Chi
Citations in the corpus
- Outage Constrained Robust Transmit Optimization for Multiuser MISO Downlinks: Tractable Approximations by Conic Optimization (2011, methodology): “[31] I. Bechar, “A Bernstein-type inequality for stochastic processes of quadratic forms of Gaussian variables,” 2009, preprint, available on http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.3595.”
- A More Powerful Two-Sample Test in High Dimensions using Random Projection (2011, background): “f concentration bounds for Gaussian quadratic forms, which are stated below in Lemma 1 (see Appendix A for proof). These bounds are similar to results in the papers of Bechar, and Laurent and Massart [20, 21] (c.f. Lemma 3 in Appendix A), but have error terms involving the spectral norm as opposed t”